There are a lot of opinions on whether a person should hire an attorney locally or go to the next large city to choose their legal counsel. It is not that easy of a question to answer actually. There are good and bad reasons for both. To hire an unfamiliar criminal defense attorney, from the location that you have court, can be risky. But there are reasons that is can be a very wise decision. The local attorney usually knows the ropes. They also may know the politics in the courthouse. Knowing who to talk to can help immensely. Sometimes people get favors for political contributions or have inside connections and relationships that an outside lawyer will not have. If you are in the Bryan or College Station area you would be wise to discuss your case with http://www.erictorberson.com in order find how to find the best path for you and your case. You may have a person who you know that has used a particular attorney and that is ok. If you have no other choice you may have to use that attorney. An out of town attorney may have more skill and expertise that any local counsel that you find though. That may be the trade off. They may also charge more money for travel. In the end it will be worth it to research and speak to different attorneys to find which one you feel comfortable with. A Bryan or College Station Criminal Defense Attorney will most likely be your best choice rather than an out of town lawyer. When you are dealing with a small town legal situation, you may not know who to talk to or to trust. It is good to ask a lot detailed questions about the process and the outcome in order to get a feel about if your are comfortable with your lawyer.
The national highway traffic safety administration puts out studies. Some of their studies are based on statistics given to them by each state. Impaired driving studies are popular statistics used in newspapers and courtrooms. Buts what they do not tell you is how incomplete the studies really are. Not all of the states report much of their statistics and what they do report is incomplete. Some states are more incomplete than others. NHTSA compensates for the missing data by using multiple imputation to make up data to add in their numbers. This means where a blood alcohol test may not have been needed at the time of the fatality the person is now presumed intoxicated. The study uses .08 as the level of impairment. This presumes intoxication when the person is not intoxicated. How this can be accepted is somewhat unbelievable. These statistics are used to place fear into the public and into the jurors. This requires a person accused of a crime to seek a quality Austin Lawyer in order to battle the false information out there. The NHTSA admits that information is being invented. Fear causes people to make poor decisions. Fear helps control the masses. Take a look at the media. It has used fear for years to cause people to think irrationally over and over. Do not let fear perpetuate ignorance.